Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 2005No. 15-02-11947; A121622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Wife assigns error to six rulings that the trial court made in this dissolution of marriage case. Five deal with the court’s property division; on de novo review, ORS 19.415(2), we affirm them without discussion. The sixth assignment of error deals with the court’s order holding wife in contempt for failing to notify husband that she had vacated the marital residence. On that issue, we reverse.

In its property division, the trial court awarded the marital residence to husband and ordered wife to vacate within 30 days of receiving a sum of money from husband. She did so, moving out by May 28,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. MacLeay Estate Co. v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Air Rescue Sys. Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Sergeyev v. VasylenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. Sergeyev v. VasylenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API