Legal Opinion

Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 13, 1934No. 3783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bland, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Importer bas bere appealed from tbe decision of tbe United States Customs Court, Third Division, affirming that of tbe single judge sitting in reappraisement, bolding tbe dutiable value of 119% gross of fruit preserves, imported from England, to be tbe foreign market value, which consisted of tbe unit invoice prices less 2% per centum discount, plus “packing”, as appraised, and not tbe unit invoice prices less 7}í per centum discount, plus “packing”, as claimed by tbe importer. •

It is conceded that there is no question of export value. Tbe sole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Pleissner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. United States v. Hammel, Riglander & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Haviland & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. The United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API