United States v. Haviland & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Application for Review of a Decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers. The decision below is reported as G. A. 6,655 (T. D. 28,382).
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge.
The merchandise in question is TJaviland china. The local appraiser advanced the importers’ invoice prices for duty. The importers appealed, under Act June 10, 1890, c. 407. § 13, 26 Stat. 136 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1932), and the case went before a single General Appraiser (Judge Waite), who found its eu - tered value correct. The government then appealed to a board of three General Appraisers, called in the record “Board No. 2.” This board advanced the goods 16.5 per cent, above the entered value, and liquidation was made on that basis. Thereupon the importer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Godillot & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- The Lace House v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
- G. Gulbenkian & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Hermann v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934