Legal Opinion

The United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1965No. Customs Appeal 5186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

The United States, hereinafter appellant, appeals from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, Appellate Term, 52 Cust.Ct. 620, A.R.D. 169, affirming the decision of the trial court,1 wherein it was held in substance that the sales of the involved merchandise in small quantities were for experimental and testing purposes, and thus not in the ordinary course of trade. In determining the dutiable value, the court disregarded such sales.

The merchandise involved is PHENI-DONE, a coal tar product used in photography. PHENIDONE was exported from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MuehlsteinUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Kobe Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Jenkins Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  5. United States v. G. Gennert, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Amerimex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  3. The United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API