Legal Opinion
Corley v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1342 (CKK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, seeking money damages from the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), and alleging that the defendants maintained and/or relied on inaccurate records resulting in adverse parole decisions for the plaintiff. This case is now before the court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss or for summary judgment and the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. 1 A review of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Adams v. MiddlebrooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Resendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lee v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.