Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Butchee

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1942No. 36805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The defendants-appellees, alleging that J. C. Nance, trustee, and David Tilley, who is representing his minor daughter Johnny Tilley, do not appear as principals in the bond which was furnished by the plaintiffs-appellants when the appeal in this case was perfected, moved to have the appeal dismissed as to these parties.

The judgment appealed from was signed on the 12th day of May, 1942. On the same day the “plaintiffs” (Wesley W. Maddox; David Tilley, in behalf of his minor daughter Johnny Tilley; and J. C. Nance, trustee) were granted both a suspensive and a devolutive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of UthoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Fontini v. Pine Grove Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Frankel v. Morse Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. Sandel v. DouglasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blaize v. CazezuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Cryer v. CryerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API