Hays v. Mercier
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of Chase county. Tried! below before Cochean, J. cited: Griggs v. LePoidevin, 11 Neb., 385. Hardy v. Miller, Id., 395. -Bourgette v. Hubinger, 30 Ind., 304. GreaB Western Mnfg. Co. v. Hunter Brothers, 15 Neb., 32. Doolittle v. Píente, 16 Id., 153. Peck v. Hensley, 21 Ind., 344..
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court of Chase county. Tried! below before Cochean, J. cited: Griggs v. LePoidevin, 11 Neb., 385. Hardy v. Miller, Id., 395. -Bourgette v. Hubinger, 30 Ind., 304. GreaB Western Mnfg. Co. v. Hunter Brothers, 15 Neb., 32. Doolittle v. Píente, 16 Id., 153. Peck v. Hensley, 21 Ind., 344.. Manly v. Downing, 15 Neb., 637. Kneeland Mechanic’s-Lien, Sec. 269. cited: Kneeland, 27, 221. Grant v. Vandercook, 57 Barb., 165. Muldoon v, Pitt, 54 N. Y., 269. Anderson v. Knudsen, 33 Minn., 172. Pugg v. Hoover, 28 Id., 404. Davis v. LivingstonP. 29 Cal., 283.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Chase county, and was for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The action is against Thomas Mercier, as owner of the property^ and Mary J. Mercier. John M. H. Hooker and Hannibal H„. Whitman are made defendants, as owners of some interest in the property. Hooker filed his separate answer setting up a mechanic’s lien as sub-contractor. Thomas Mercier and Mary J. Mercier filed a general demurrer to the petition.. The demurrer was sustained and plaintiff’s cause dismissed, from which he appeals to this court.
Since the filing of the case in the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Scarborough v. MyrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Bennett v. OttoNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Wyman v. QuayleWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
- Claflin v. American National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.