Legal Opinion
Barber v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 27, 2006No. 2D05-3273PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
918 So.2d 1013 (2006)
Walter BARBER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 2D05-3273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
January 27, 2006.
Walter Barber, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
SALCINES, Judge.
Walter Barber, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that, in circuit court cases 01-01128 and 01-08189, the trial court was prohibited by section 812.025,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilson v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- O'LEARY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- KABLITZ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.