Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 1, 2005No. 2D04-5530PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

905 So.2d 1016 (2005)

Mario ORTIZ, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 2D04-5530.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 1, 2005.

Mario Ortiz, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

In his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), Mario Ortiz alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue on direct appeal that the jury instruction on the justifiable use of deadly force, which was given in his trial on the charge of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Fair v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. York v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Granberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Toby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Dill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API