Legal Opinion

Uuku v. Kaio

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff brought an action to quiet title, claiming an undivided one-eighth interest in fee simple in certain lands described in the declaration. The defendants denied that plaintiff had any title and the verdict and the judgment were for the defendants. Thereupon plaintiff sued out this writ of error.

At the trial now under review it was stipulated “that the plaintiff and the defendants both claim an interest in the lands described in plaintiff’s complaint under the same source of title, to wit, as heirs of Isaac H. Kahilina, deceased; that the defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stitt v. HuidekopersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Clement v. CartwrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. Kum Foo SungHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Weston v. MontgomeryHawaii Supreme Court · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Territory v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Territory v. FukunagaHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Territory v. Van DaldenHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Deponte v. Ulupalakua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API