Legal Opinion

State v. Chang

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1962No. 4202PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants Harold H. Chang and Edward P. Toner were charged with conspiracy in the first degree in a single count indictment alleging that sometime prior to August 4, 1959, they mutually undertook and conspired to commit the offense of gross cheat with intent to defraud the City and County of Honolulu of more than $100 by “a scheme whereby false and fraudulent claims for the delivery of and payment for Incontinent Pads to Maluhia Hospital were made to said City and County of Honolulu.” Having been found guilty of the charge by a jury, they have appealed the conviction by writ of error.

There…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. AntoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. MontalboHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API