People v. Pieri
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The appeal in these three cases challenges the constitutionality of subdivision 11 of section 722 of the Penal Law. As there appears to be some uncertainty as to the meaning of the section we must at the very beginning analyze its provisions to ascertain just what acts are made criminal. Section 722: “ Any person who with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or whereby a breach of the peace may be occasioned, commits any of the following acts shall be deemed to have committed the offense of disorderly conduct:
“ * * * Who bears an evil reputation and with an unlawful purpose…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- People v. HildebrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- State v. AnthonyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.