People v. Hildebrandt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
The question of law on this appeal is: may it be inferred, from the fact that a person is the owner of an automobile, that he is its driver at a particular time?
Defendant’s conviction, in a Court of Special Sessions, was for the “ traffic infraction ” (see Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 29) of driving an automobile at a speed illegal in a restricted speed zone (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 56, subd. 4; § 95-c). The penalty imposed was a small fine. Police officers, to measure the speed, had used a ‘ ‘ phototraffic camera ’ ’ which takes two photos, at a set time interval apart, of a moving…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People v. TerraNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. PieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- People v. FirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- People v. PhinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.