Legal Opinion

People v. Hildebrandt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1955PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

The question of law on this appeal is: may it be inferred, from the fact that a person is the owner of an automobile, that he is its driver at a particular time?

Defendant’s conviction, in a Court of Special Sessions, was for the “ traffic infraction ” (see Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 29) of driving an automobile at a speed illegal in a restricted speed zone (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 56, subd. 4; § 95-c). The penalty imposed was a small fine. Police officers, to measure the speed, had used a ‘ ‘ phototraffic camera ’ ’ which takes two photos, at a set time interval apart, of a moving…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People v. TerraNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. People v. RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. People v. PieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. People v. FirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. People v. PhinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API