People v. Dunn
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentRiley, J.
Because I would hold that defendant’s statements to law enforcement officers are not inadmissible as a part of a plea negotiation, and that a remand is unwarranted because the evidence is admissible on remand, I dissent.
i
Defendant Alex Dunn was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to deliver between 225 and 650 grams of cocaine, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(ii); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(ii). He later pleaded guilty of being an habitual offender, second offense, MCL 769.10; MSA 28.1082. At issue is the admission of statements he made while in custody. Ypsilanti police detectives James Hall and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. ConteMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.