Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dunn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1994No. 93832, (Calendar No. 3)Published

1DissentRiley, J.

Because I would hold that defendant’s statements to law enforcement officers are not inadmissible as a part of a plea negotiation, and that a remand is unwarranted because the evidence is admissible on remand, I dissent.

i

Defendant Alex Dunn was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to deliver between 225 and 650 grams of cocaine, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(ii); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(ii). He later pleaded guilty of being an habitual offender, second offense, MCL 769.10; MSA 28.1082. At issue is the admission of statements he made while in custody. Ypsilanti police detectives James Hall and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. People v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. ConteMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API