Elgin v. Marshall
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
This action was brought by Marshall and another, beihg citizens of Wisconsin, against the town of Elgin, Minn., to recover the amount due upon certain coupons or interest warrants, detached from municipal bonds, alleged to have been issued by it, in aid of a railroad company. The defence set up was that the bonds and coupons were void, the statute, under the assumed authority of which they had been issued, being, as was alleged, unconstitutional. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and it is part of the finding that, at the time of rendering the judgment, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barry v. MerceinSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Russell v. StansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sparrow v. StrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Stinson v. DousmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.