Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

This cause is before me on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

The plaintiff is a Kentucky corporation, doing a banking business at Catlettsburg, a city with a population of about 4,000, in this district. It has a capital stock of $50,000, surplus of about $40,000, and deposits of about $500,000. The defendant bank is a national corporation and is the Federal Reserve Bank for the Fourth District of the Federal Reserve System of the United States. It has a branch bank in Cincinnati, Ohio, and plaintiff is in the Cincinnati Division of such district. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  3. Brookings State Bank v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1921
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. First State Bank v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API