Legal Opinion

Oden v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1967No. 39173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J.†

Pee Wee Investments, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Pee Wee), owned and subdivided a small tract of land north of Seattle. The city of Seattle had a franchise to furnish water to that area. It had an old 4-inch wooden water main on the south side of 185th Street while the Pee Wee property fronted on the north side of that street. The city had a plan to lay an 8-inch line along the north side of said street as a replacement of the 4-inch line. Pee Wee had plans prepared for water service to its addition which had been approved by the city.

Plaintiff had an oral contract with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Filley v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Forman v. Columbia Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Murray v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  4. Parrish v. Southwest Washington Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Lake Sewer District No. 1 v. Liberty Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Western Ag Land Partners v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API