Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Cargill Meat Solutions, Corp.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided December 11, 2009No. 4:09CV3079PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.

The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges a claim for unpaid wages and injunctive relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. The plaintiffs allege defendant Cargill Meat Solutions, Corporation (“Cargill”) has violated and continues to violate the FLSA by requiring non-exempt employees at Cargill’s facility at Schuyler, Nebraska to work substantial amounts of time “off-the-cloek” and without pay, and by failing to provide them with the meal and rest periods to which they are entitled by law. Filing No. 1, ¶ 1.

The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Joanie Dybach v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Leonard R. Woods v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. Dealer Warranty Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
  2. Byard v. Verizon West Virginia, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2012
  3. Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Hose v. Henry Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  5. Frazier v. PJ Iowa, L.C.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API