Legal Opinion
Hearod v. Baggs
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 2005No. 26703PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY W. BATES, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Jimmy and Nikki Hearod (“the Hearods”) brought an ejectment action against defendant Margie Baggs (“Margie”). 1 In Margie’s answer, she asserted the affirmative defense of adverse possession. The Hearods filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Margie contends summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact exist that require a trial to resolve. We agree. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In February 2004, the Hearods filed a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Ganaway v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of South Greenfield v. CagleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Murphy v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barekman v. City of RepublicMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Stone v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hitchcock v. New Prime, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Farm Properties Holdings, L.L.C. v. Lower Grassy Creek Cemetery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kenneth White and Eleanor White v. George MatthewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.