Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. L. F. Still & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1986No. 73188PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

L. F. Still and Co. (Still) filed an action in 1985 to revive its dormant judgment against Herman Rothstein. After an answer and counterclaim had been filed, Still voluntarily dismissed its complaint and moved for dismissal of the counterclaim. Rothstein now appeals the trial court’s grant of that motion.

The judgment appellee sought to revive was obtained by default in 1975. Appellant alleged in his answer that the 1975 judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction. The counterclaim sought damages for malicious abuse of process (Count I) and invasion of privacy (Count…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Baldwin v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Davison-Paxon Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Dennis v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guernsey Petroleum Corp. v. Data General Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Lawton v. Georgia Television Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. American Express Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Griggs v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Foster & Kleiser, Inc. v. Coe & Payne Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API