Legal Opinion

Davison-Paxon Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1932No. 8314PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

We are of the opinion that the first question should be answered in the negative. In a suit for malicious use of process “it is well settled that the plaintiff must allege three things: (1) that the suit against him was malicious; (2) that it was without probable cause; and (3) that it had terminated in his (plaintiff’s) favor before the suit for damages was filed.” Clement v. Orr, 4 Ga. App. 117, 118 (60 S. E. 1017); Marable v. Mayer, 78 Ga. 710 (3 S. E. 429). Allegations of a petition, in a suit for malicious use of process, that the former suit was an action of bail-trover, and that after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Brantley v. Rhodes-Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. McElreath v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Clement v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Marable v. Mayer, Son & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Public Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Lane Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Ellis v. Millen Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Medoc Corp. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API