Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Leesona Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
Decision here is required concerning the legal effect to be given to a grant-back provision embodied in a written license to Leesona Corporation, defendant, to make and sell certain inventions. Plaintiff was the licensor and defendant the licensee, the date of the contract being November 23, 1954.
The position of the intervenor, The Permatwist Company, will be the subject of separate comment.
The parties will be referred to as the plaintiff, the defendant, and the intervenor, without regard to certain changes in corporate titles which have occurred during the interval…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Transparent-Wrap MacHine Corp. v. Stokes & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Cone & Wafer Co. v. Consolidated Wafer Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- In re ConeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- West Disinfecting Co. v. United States Paper Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Deering Milliken Research Corporation v. Leesona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963