Legal Opinion

Deering Milliken Research Corporation v. Leesona Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 1963No. 27628_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

315 F.2d 475

DEERING MILLIKEN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Warren A. Seem, Nicholas J. Stoddard, Frederick Tecce and Harold P. Berger, copartners trading as The Permatwist Company, Intervenor,

v.

LEESONA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 76.

Docket 27628.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 30, 1962.

Decided March 29, 1963.

Granville M. Brumbaugh, New York City (Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, on the brief; Stuart N. Updike, James N. Buckner, and Lee W. Meyer, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert F. Conrad, Washington,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Leesona Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  2. Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API