Legal Opinion
American Wild Horse Campaign v. Zinke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-1529Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, et al., Civil Action No. 18-1529 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. DAVID BERNHARDT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION When adopting the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (“WHBA”) in 1971, Congress recognized that “wild free-roaming horses . . . are living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West” and that these animals “contribute to the diversity of life forms within the Nation and enrich the lives of the American people.” 16 U.S.C. § 1331. Yet, if not properly…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.