Legal Opinion

Continental Trust Co. v. Witt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, P.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

■' The assignments of error on behalf of the plaintiff present but a single question for our decision, which is, indeed, one of fact, namely:

1. Was the condition, upon which the note sued on was given by the maker, a condition precedent, without the occurrence of which the note was not at any time to become a valid and binding obligation of the maker; or was it a condition subsequent, the occurrence of which was to discharge and put an end to the otherwise valid and binding obligation of the note?

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitaker & Fowle v. LaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Tuley v. BartonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Solenberger v. Gilbert's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  4. Rector v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. Robertson v. Virginia National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crafts v. Broadway National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. Atkinson v. NeblettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Weirton Savings & Loan Company v. CortezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Harriss, Magill & Co. v. John H. Rodgers & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. State-Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. First Nat. Bank of VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API