Legal Opinion

Ace Flying Service, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Agriculture

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 12, 1957No. 17974PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

This action was brought by plaintiff in error, to whom we will refer as plaintiff, against defendants in error, to whom we will hereinafter refer as defendants, to re*21cover the loss allegedly sustained by it as a result of defendants’ conduct in preventing the performance of a contract.

Plaintiff alleged in its complaint: That it entered into a written contract with defendants under which it agreed to spray 1,500,000 acres of range land in order to control a grasshopper infestation; that it was to receive 13% cents per acre for the work and materials to be used; that it submitted its bid of 13%…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. DeboltSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Georgia v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Regents of the University System v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Todd v. Board of Educational Lands and FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Kersten Co., Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. SJ Groves & Sons Co. v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API