Regents of the University System v. Blanton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. A State, or any of its departments entering into contracts, lays aside its attributes of sovereignty, and binds itself substantially as one of its citizens does when lie enters into a contract, and, in general, its contracts are interpreted as the contracts of individuals are, and are controlled by the same laws. Ohio L. Ins. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. (U. S.) 416 (14 L. ed. 997); 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 117, notes. Where there is an act of the State legislature authorizing a contract by a State department, the courts have power to enforce the contract against the State. Carr v. State, 127 Ind.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- The ReesideU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
- Branch, Sons & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Board of Education v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Kersten Co., Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Curtis Publishing Company v. Wallace Butts, Wallace Butts v. Curtis Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- SJ Groves & Sons Co. v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.