Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of Reynoldsburg v. Banks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1974No. 73-418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The warrant submitted to respondent for his signature having been specifically authorized by an ordinance of city council and being regular and valid on its face, respondent was required by law to sign it. R. C. 733.43 and 733.44. Payment is, therefore, a ministerial duty of respondent.

Relator having shown a clear legal duty on the part of respondent to sign the warrant submitted to him pursuant to the ordinance of February 12, 1973, mandamus will lie to compel respondent to sign such warrant.

As to respondent’s counterclaim, there is no showing by respondent of any clear legal duty on the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Halloran v. ZapatonyOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API