American Coat Pad Co. of Baltimore City v. Phœnix Pad Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.
1Opinion of the Court
PURNELL, District Judge.
The appeal is from a decree of the circuit court of Maryland in a patent case, granting a preliminary injunction restraining appellants, defendants below, until the further order of the court, from infringing the patent rights to which the.appellee, plaintiff below, claims to be entitled under letters patent No. 359,441, issued to Edward Goldman, dated March 13, 1887. The title of appellee to the letters patent is set out in the verified bill,, supported by the affidavits of Gustav Goldman, president of the appellee company, and others. Assuming title to the letters…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Loew Filter Co. v. German-American Filter Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Boston Lasting-Mach. Co. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
- Consolidated Fastener Co. v. American Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1899
- Smith v. Meriden Britannia Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States of America, for the Use of R. F. Hudson v. Peerless Insurance Company, United States of America, for the Use of R. M. Bartenstein, John H. Bartenstein, and Michael H. Kelly, T/a R. M. Bartenstein & Associates v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Toledo Boiler Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- National Cash Register Co. v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- United States ex rel. Hudson v. Peerless InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Barnes v. BoydDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.