Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark A. Horek
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1998No. 97-2268PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Horek appeals a nine-month sentence of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of his probation. Horek argues the sentence is illegal because the district court failed to deduct the four months he served in community confinement as a condition of probation from the maximum sentence available for his original offense. This court rejects Horek’s argument that the time spent in community confinement as a condition of probation must be deducted from his maximum term of imprisonment and affirms.1
Background
The chronology of this case is not in .dispute. In April 1994, Horek…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Nancy Ruth Iversen, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gordon Allen MaltaisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Larry G. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cohn v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Loeffler v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.