Legal Opinion

United States v. Hurst

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1996No. 95-6283PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Jessie Hurst plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States by uttering counterfeit United States currency. 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 472. The district court sentenced Mr. Hurst to fifteen months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Approximately six months after…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Harold DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Wiley Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. TisdaleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Donald E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Joseph SchwegelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. TsosieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API