Legal Opinion

Pawlowski v. Pawlowski

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1996No. 95-275PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

In a divorce action filed in a multi-judge district, the parties learned of the assigned judge only when the case was set for trial. Four days later, appellant filed a motion for peremptory disqualification, which was denied by the assigned judge as untimely.

We reverse.

ISSUE

While appellant sets forth numerous alleged errors during the course of this divorce action and trial, there is but one determinative issue:

Did the court commit error in denying the Motion for Peremptory Disqualification of judge under W.R.C.P. 40.1(b)(1)?

FACTS

Appellant filed a divorce complaint in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NeilArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cotton v. BrowWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Global Shipping and Trading, Ltd. v. Verkhnesaldincky Metallurgic Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Platte Development Co. v. State, Environmental Quality CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hirschfield v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Weller v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Routh v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sheridan Retirement Partners v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API