Legal Opinion

Sheridan Retirement Partners v. City of Sheridan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1997No. 96-226PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Sheridan Retirement Partners (Sheridan Partners), filed a declaratory judgment action claiming that appellee, City of Sheridan, improperly assessed plan investment fees for a retirement home project. The district court found that the lawsuit was actually a request for review of an agency action and, as such, was not timely filed within thirty days after notice of the final agency decision. Accordingly, the district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We agree with the district court’s finding regarding the nature and timeliness…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pawlowski v. PawlowskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Brunsvold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Platte Development Co. v. State, Environmental Quality CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Campbell County School District v. CatchpoleWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wooster v. Carbon County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Laughter v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API