Legal Opinion

Gregg, G. v. Ameriprise Financial

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 2018No. 1504 WDA 2017PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.:

Introduction

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.; Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.; Riversource Life Insurance Company; and Robert A. Kovalchik ("the insurance companies") appeal a non-jury verdict finding that they deceitfully profited from a business transaction with Gary and Mary Gregg. The trial judge held the insurance companies in violation of the "catchall" provision of Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL). 1 That catchall provision prohibits anyone who advertises, sells, or distributes goods or services from "[e]ngaging in any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. DeArmitt v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Wyatt Inc. v. CITIZENS BANK OF PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Richards, R. v. Ameriprise FinancialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Garwood, R. v. Ameriprise FinancialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Sereda, J. v. Center City AcquisitionsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Comwlth. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Garwood, R. v. Ameriprise FinancialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API