Legal Opinion
Andrew Toth v. Usx Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 25, 1989No. 88-2889PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
In this case we are asked to decide whether the defendant, USX Corporation (“USX”), may institute a leave policy, refuse all but six applications under the policy and then rescind the policy without formally consulting their workers’ union (in this case, the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC (“USWA”, the “Union” )) or notifying other potentially eligible claimants. Fifteen former USX employees who were technically eligible under the new leave policy sue for monetary and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arroyo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,352 Martin A. Rankow v. First Chicago Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- TURNER v. Local Union No. 302, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Robert J. Meza v. General Battery Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thermon Phillips, E.B. Rich, Usx Corporation A/K/A United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Titan Tire Corp. of Freeport, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.