Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. Hallmark

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 2, 1980No. Civ. 2025PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court divorced the parties and the wife filed a motion for new trial. In response to this motion, the trial court amended a property settlement which was incorporated into the decree of divorce.

The husband appeals contending the trial court had no authority to amend the judgment. We agree and reverse and remand.

The record reveals the following: The trial court entered a final decree of divorce on December 20, 1978. The wife's motion, designated as a motion for new trial, was certified as having been served on January 19, 1979, the 19th being the thirtieth day after the divorce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. BarlarCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. City of Talladega v. McRaeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Erwin v. Shiloh HomesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jasper Community Hospital v. HydeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Gamble v. First Alabama BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. SUPERIOR SECURITY SERVICE, INC. v. Azalea City Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Battle v. BattleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Sparks v. Delta Masonry ContractorsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API