Legal Opinion
Thomas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 22, 1998No. 95-749 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This military pay case stands on defendant’s motion filed March 12, 1996 to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and plaintiffs cross-motion filed August 7, 1996 for summary judgment. In essence, plaintiff seeks relief in addition to that granted to him by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). We conclude that we have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs claims but that plaintiff fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
I
P…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Spehr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Scarseth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Hwang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.