Legal Opinion
Jain v. McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 2011No. 09 Civ. 6520(SHS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Parul Jain brings this action against the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”), Standard & Poor’s Corporation (“S & P”), Diane Vazza, and David Wyss for violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act. 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. She also asserts various New York state law claims against defendants. Plaintiffs claims arise from her employment at S & P from 2005 through her termination in 2008. The complaint originally alleged fifteen counts against defendants; Jain has voluntarily withdrawn two of those counts. Defendants have now moved for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Twin Laboratories, Inc. v. Weider Health & Fitness, a Corporation, I, Brute Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Davis-Bell v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Villar v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Johnson v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Kellman v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.