State v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I
Biíowít, J.
The defendant contends that the penalty of death is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore unconstitutional.
The United States Supreme Court, in Furman v. Georgia (decided June 29, 1972), 33 L. Ed. 2d 346, has held that the carrying out of a death penalty imposed at the discretion of the trier of the facts constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
TJnder that holding, which we are required to follow, the infiction of the death penalty under the existing law of Ohio is now unconstitutional…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. NieldsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.