Legal Opinion

Harbaugh's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1935No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The principal question in this appeal is whether the maker of a negotiable instrument who makes payment to the payee after the latter, before maturity, has endorsed the note to another, may be relieved of liability on the note if evidence is received showing that the payee acted as the endorsee’s agent or that payment was in fact received by the endorsee. The law is uniform that payment to the payee of a negotiable instrument when title and possession of the instrument has passed to another before maturity will not protect the maker: Brannon, Negotiable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Bank of the University v. TuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Mallory's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Markee v. ReyburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Catanach's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Huffman Estate (No. 3)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Matheny EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. First National Bank of Portland v. Hartman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. United States v. SiplerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API