Legal Opinion
Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles Goldfarb
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1976No. 75--1497PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Goldfarb was held liable in the District Court for executing and filing, . without any authority, a surety bond in another action, which surety bond he signed as attorney in fact for United Bonding Insurance Company (United), and caused a writ of garnishment obtained by the plaintiff-appellee to be released. In that action the plaintiff later obtained a judgment which it was unable to collect from the judgment debtor. Plaintiff then made claim against United, which denied liability on the ground that Goldfarb was without authority to execute and file the surety bond. If said bond…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brusslan v. LarsenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Union National Bank v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Newberry v. SlafterMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank of Chicago v. Jefferson Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- The First National Bank of Chicago, (Appellee and Cross-Appellant) v. Jefferson Mortgage Company, (Appellee and Cross-Appellee) v. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Company, Inc., (Appellant and Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978