Legal Opinion

Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles Goldfarb

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1976No. 75--1497Published

1Opinion of the Court

531 F.2d 820

HOESCH HANDEL AG, formerly known as Hoesch Handel GMBH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Charles GOLDFARB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75--1497.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1976.

Before WEICK and McCREE, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit judge.

ORDER

1

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and it is hereby denied.

2

McCREE, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

3

I would grant the motion for rehearing. The loss occasioned by plaintiff caused by its reliance on Goldbarb's misrepresentation is the amount that Hoesch Handel would have recovered from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Hoesch Handel Ag, Formerly Known as Hoesch Handel Gmbh v. Charles GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API