Legal Opinion

PacifiCorp v. Department of Revenue

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1992No. 91-242PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The Montana Department of Revenue (DOR), defendant and respondent in this Court, pursuant to Rule 23(h), M.R.App.P., appeals from two final orders of the District Court of the First Judicial District, Lewis & Clark County. The District Court reversed the State Tax Appeal Board’s (STAB) admission of eight documents into evidence based on PacifiCorp’s attorney-client privilege, and remanded the case to STAB for a new hearing. Appellant PacifiCorp cross-appealed from an order of the District Court which upheld STAB’s denial of PacifiCorp’s motion to compel the DOR to produce audit report…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. United States v. ZolinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Kuiper v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Farr v. MischlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Martin v. BNSF Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API