Legal Opinion

State v. Spino

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1963No. 36139PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

In this action an attack is made upon the constitutionality of RCW 9.09.020, defining arson in the second degree. This statute provides:

“Every person who, under circumstances not amounting to arson in the first degree, shall wilfully burn or set on fire any building, or any structure or erection appurtenant to or adjoining any building, or any wharf, dock, threshing machine, threshing engine, automobile or other motor vehicle, motorboat, steamboat, sailboat, aircraft, bridge or trestle, or any hay, grain, crop or timber, whether cut or standing, or any lumber, shingle or other timber…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Remington Arms Co. v. SkaggsWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hauser v. ArnessWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. VanderveerWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API