Legal Opinion

Ross v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1955No. 32872, 32873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Thomas W. Ross and William Tulip commenced separate actions to recover damages for personal injuries. The injuries were sustained as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by Mr. Ross and a freight train operated by the defendant at a railroad crossing in Kent, Washington. Mr. Tulip was a passenger in the automobile.

The actions were consolidated for trial. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court ruled that plaintiff Ross was chargeable with contributory negligence, as a matter of law. His action was dismissed. Mr. Tulip’s case was submitted to the jury and resulted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Garrow v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rutherford v. DeurWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Dayton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodge v. StencilWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bickel v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Papac v. Mayr Bros. Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API