Papac v. Mayr Bros. Logging Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their cause of action for damages, upon a finding of contributory negligence. Plaintiffs acknowledge that there is but one issue on appeal—whether or not there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding of contributory negligence. A review of the evidence is re quired. to determine if there was substantial evidence in support of this finding. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959).
The defendant, Mayr Brothers Logging Company, Inc., entered into a logging contract with plaintiffs, Pete Papac and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- DeYoung v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raybell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Xieng v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991