Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Schumacher
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 7, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRELL, Justice.
Appellants are registered optometrists under the law of this state. Appellees constitute the Florida State Board of Optometry, which will hereinafter be referred to as the Board. It promulgated rules and regulations governing the practice of optometry. Appellants filed their complaint charging said rules and regulations to be ultra vires and discriminatory. It prayed that the Board be restrained from enforcing them. The complaint was dismissed and the plaintiffs appealed.
The point for determination is whether or not Rules 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 27, governing the practice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard Co. Jewelers v. N.J. State Bd. OptometristsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- NJ ST. BD. OF OPTOMETRISTS v. MH Harris, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- ABELSON'S v. New Jersey State Bd. of OptometristsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Grissom v. OrsdelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967