Legal Opinion

Cox v. Darragh Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1957No. 5-1150PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

Appellee sued appellant on a promissory note. The only defense interposed was usury. The case was tried before the Circuit Judge, sitting as a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of appellee.

The sole question presented to us is whether there is substantial evidence to support the decision and judgment of the trial court.

The facts involved in this case, which in most part are undisputed, are substantially as hereinafter set out. Appellee, with its head office in Little Bock, Arkansas, is a corporation which owns and operates a feed store in Camden. The Camden…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garvin v. LintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Morris v. School District No. 86Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. Temple v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Hinton v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Winkle v. Grand National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Brooks v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Peoples Loan and Investment Company v. BoothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API