Legal Opinion

Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2010No. Docket 137111PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

This case raises the question whether, absent a finding that a peremptory challenge is barred by Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; 106 S Ct 1712; 90 L Ed 2d 69 (1986), because it is motivated by race, a trial court may nevertheless deny a party the use of a peremptory challenge on the basis of the court’s desire to attain a racially proportionate jury. We hold that such a denial violates the rule of Batson that jurors must be “indifferently chosen” and is therefore in violation of both the equal protection guarantees of the federal and state constitutions, US Const, Am Xiy § 1 and Const 1963 art…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. JonasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. LaFayette DeShawn Upshaw v. George StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Chinnery v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  5. Abdul Nahshal v. Fremont Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API