Legal Opinion

In Re Upl Advisory Opinion 2002-1

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 12, 2004No. S03U1532PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted the State Bar of Georgia’s petition for discretionary review to consider the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law (“UPL”) that in situations where a physician transfers an outstanding account to a collector for either a set fee or a contingency fee, if the collector is authorized to and does file suit to recover the debt on the physician’s behalf, the collector is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. UPL Advisory Opinion No. 2002-1 (July 1, 2002). See State Bar Rule 14-9.1 (g) (3) (authorizing this Court to grant petition for discretionary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Huber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. In Re Upl Advisory Opinion 2003-2Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Judicial Qualifications Commission Formal Advisory Opinion No. 239Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. People v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. Adams v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William SullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Amended July 10, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William SullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API